Posts tagged "patents"

Apple-Samsung Case Shows Smartphone as Legal Magnet

The smartphone in your hand is a marvel of innovation, packing sophisticated computing and communications technologies into a sleek digital device.

It is also a litigation magnet.

In the last few years, the companies in the smartphone industry have spent billions of dollars buying patents and hundreds of millions suing one another. on Friday, that battle reached a peak with the decision by a federal jury in San Jose, Calif., to award Apple $1.05 billion in damages from Samsung for infringing on just six patents.

The case underscores how dysfunctional the patent system has become. Patent litigation has followed every industrial innovation, whether it is steam engines, cars, phones or semiconductors, but the smartphone wars are bigger, global and unusually complex.

And it is the courts, rather than the patent office, that are being used to push companies toward a truce. In the end, consumers may be the losers.

“It is hard not to see all the patent buying and patent lawsuits as a distortion of the role of patents,” said Josh Lerner, an economist and patent expert at Harvard Business School. “They are supposed to be an incentive for innovation.”

Samsung says it will challenge the jury's decision, which covered design basics like the shape of the iPhone itself and its array of small on-screen icons. So the courtroom conflict could continue for years, and even then, the case is but one of dozens of suits and countersuits in 10 countries between Apple and Samsung, the world's two leading smartphone makers.

But Apple has more than Samsung in its sights in its litigation campaign against the Korean electronics giant. Samsung is the leader among companies using Google's Android mobile operating system. So while Apple may be suing Samsung in courtrooms from Germany to Australia, the real enemy is up the road from Apple's headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., at the Googleplex in Mountain View.

Ultimately, the Apple-Samsung roadshow is just the main attraction in the global smartphone patent wars. the roster of litigants includes Microsoft, Nokia, HTC, Google's Motorola Mobility subsidiary and others.

In a recent case between Apple and Motorola, Judge Richard A. Posner, a prominent federal appeals court judge in Chicago, said in court that the use of patents in the smartphone industry showed a system in “chaos.” In June, Judge Posner dismissed the case, chastising both sides. He heaped scorn on Apple's broad claims for its user-experience patents and on Motorola's claim that Apple should pay a rich royalty on its basic communications patents. Both companies have appealed.

The disputes are fueled, legal experts say, by companies rushing to apply for patents as both defensive and offensive weapons, and by overburdened government examiners granting patents too easily.

“The smartphone patent battles are enabled by lots of trivial patents that never should have been granted in the first place,” said James E. Bessen, a patent expert and lecturer at the Boston University School of Law. “That's where Judge Posner was coming from in his ruling.”

To the winners of the patent wars, the rewards will be rich. Mobile computing, or smartphones and tablets, is the most lucrative and fastest-growing market in business. it has made Apple the most valuable company in the world. As Samsung passed Apple in the last year to become the largest smartphone maker, its profits surged along with its sales.

Despite the hostilities, experts say the smartphone patent wars will eventually end in an industrial armistice.

The California court decision, if it holds up on appeal, could have that effect. “This ruling sends a message to all the handset makers that you have to make truly differentiated products that look different,” said Colleen V. Chien, an assistant professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law. “And that's the message Apple wanted to send with its litigation.”

Most legal experts thought Apple would have the most trouble winning infringement judgments on its design patents, which are generally considered weaker than engineering patents for hardware or software, known as utility patents.

But the jury found that Samsung infringed on three of the four design patents in the case. the fourth was a patent for shape of a tablet computer — a rectangle with rounded corners.

“This could open up a whole new front in the patent wars, as companies race to file applications for design patents,” said Kevin G. Rivette, a Silicon Valley consultant and former vice president of intellectual property strategy for I.B.M.

Yet Mr. Rivette is convinced that the smartphone patent wars will subside and an accommodation will be reached. the sheer number of smartphone patents and the speed of innovation in product development undermine the power of the patents. that is very different than the role patents play in an industry like pharmaceuticals, where a blockbuster drug may be covered by a single patent or a few. In chemistry, the molecule is the patentable idea.

Smartphones are very different. an infringement ruling can slow a rival down for a few months, but not block it. Samsung engineers, for example, have already devised an alternative to one of the patents found to have been infringed upon in the California decision — the “bounce” feature. Pull a finger from the top of the iPhone's touch screen to the bottom and the page bounces. on the newest Samsung smartphones, the same downward finger stroke brings a blue glow at the bottom on the touch screen, not a bounce.

“In this industry, patents are not a clean weapon to stop others,” Mr. Rivette said. “The technology, like water, will find its way around impediments.”

Apple-Samsung Case Shows Smartphone as Legal Magnet

Related Websites

    Be the first to comment - What do you think?
    Posted by admin - August 28, 2012 at 10:00 am

    Categories: Technology   Tags: , , ,

    Apple exaggerating Samsung’s smartphone profits: expert

    San Jose, California: A financial expert said Apple inc has overstated the profit margins earned by Samsung Electronics Co ltd for mobile products, an issue that goes to the heart of the high profile patent trial between the two tech companies.

    Michael Wagner, an accountant who testified on Thursday for Samsung, said Samsung’s US profits from the smartphones and tablets targeted in the case should be calculated at about 12 percent, or about $519 million.

    Earlier in the trial, an Apple expert witness testified the US margin was closer to 35.5 percent.

    Apple and Samsung are going toe-to-toe in a patents dispute that mirrors a bigger struggle for industry supremacy between the rivals that control more than half of worldwide smartphone sales.

    Apple accuses Samsung of copying the design and some features of its iPad and iPhone, and is asking for a sales ban in addition to monetary damages. South Korea’s Samsung, which is trying to expand in the United States, says Apple infringed several patents, including some for its key wireless technology.

    If the nine member jury finds that Samsung violated Apple’s design patents, the damages Apple might recoup will partly depend on how much profit Samsung earned during the period it knew it should not be using the technology.

    Earlier this week, Apple expert Terry Musika said Samsung earned 35.5 percent margins from mid-2010 through March 2012, or $8.16 billion in US revenue. Apple is seeking over $2.5 billion overall in the case.

    However, Wagner testified on Thursday that Musika did not take into account many of Samsung’s costs, including marketing, which reduced the profits. his 12 percent figure assumes a period beginning in April 2011 for most of the mobile products.

    Under cross examination from Apple attorney Michael Jacobs, Wagner acknowledged the cost information on which he relied had been prepared by Samsung specifically in response to the Apple litigation.

    However, Wagner said Samsung had never needed to break out such specifics before.

    “I have no problem with the way they allocated costs,” Wagner added.

    The case in US District Court, Northern District of California, is Apple inc v Samsung Electronics Co ltd et al, no. 11-1846.


    Apple exaggerating Samsung’s smartphone profits: expert

    Related Websites

      Be the first to comment - What do you think?
      Posted by admin - August 18, 2012 at 1:00 am

      Categories: Technology   Tags: , , , ,

      Apple, RIM, several others targeted in smartphone lawsuit

      Apple, AT&T, Research in Motion and several other companies are being sued by a company based in Frisco, Texas, according to AppleInsider. SmartPhone Technologies charges that seven of its patents have been violated, including ones related to Bluetooth, e-mail sync and some broader concepts associated with smartphones. other corporations listed in the suit include LG, Motorola, Samsung and Sanyo. With one of the patents only RIM, Motorola and Samsung are listed as infringing.

      The suit is being handled through the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, notorious for being friendly to intellectual property complaints. SmartPhone is requesting a jury trial, as well as damages and expenses as compensation. The suit is unlikely to get that far however, as most such legal battles are settled out-of-court through royalties or one-time payouts, if they are not dismissed entirely.

      Apple, RIM, several others targeted in smartphone lawsuit

      Related Websites

      Be the first to comment - What do you think?
      Posted by - March 11, 2010 at 12:00 am

      Categories: Technology   Tags: , , ,